You may have missed the point.

"You do realize the "definition" of racism you used was created by white people, for white people? Don't you think that people who have dealt with racism since the day they were born can come up with a better definition? Or are you really that arrogant and racist."

Asked by Anonymous

I completely reject the idea that white people (or any people) somehow “own” words. The word “racism” in particular is value- and race-neutral.

I honestly have no idea why so many anti-racist tumblrs want so desperately for “racism” to mean “institutional racism” when they could make the problem go away by just referring to “institutional racism” when that is what they mean.

The victims of a crime don’t get to redefine the meaning of that crime just because they are victims. That doesn’t make any sense even in theory.

Just use the term “institutional racism”. That’s obviously what you mean anyway, so why not? What’s the harm?

Wait - why are you watching them? Are you in a tree peering through their window? Leave them alone! They have their own life now.
Also, I hate using “they” as a gender neutral singular pronoun.

Wait - why are you watching them? Are you in a tree peering through their window? Leave them alone! They have their own life now.

Also, I hate using “they” as a gender neutral singular pronoun.

"Hi. I just want to let you know that while words like "Cracker" and "Honky" are considered offensive, they don't hold the same power and dehumanization like the N-word when it's used outside of reclamation. Just letting you know. (Also, do you really think that rape culture doesn't exist? 'Cause that frightens me a bit.)"

Asked by marchoftigers

I don’t consider “cracker” or “honky” offensive. And I would laugh in the face of any white person who tried to say he was “offended” by those words. Jesus Christ. Grow up.

At the moment, my position on “rape culture” as it is formulated by third-wave feminists is that it is fictional, yes. I understand this can be scary if all you’ve been hearing is one side of the debate, and you’ve probably been hearing it at top volume, and all other attempts to analyze the situation have been silenced or ridiculed. Well, today is your lucky day, marchoftigers. I’m going to link you to some stuff and today you get to make up your own mind.

Read this explanation of why rape culture is not real. Please read it all the way through, and understand it before thinking about replying. If you’re interested in more information, you’ll find lots of interesting stuff on the rape culture tag of my blog.

If you have any more questions that are not answered there, feel free to message me.

inothernews:

Besides the hype, besides the technical fuckups of NASDAQ, besides the overvaluation and offering too many shares during their IPO, I think the reason Facebook’s stock is failing as much as it is right now is that people have come to realize that Everybody’s Favorite Social Network is just too obnoxious, intrusive, and data-scrapingly assholish in the way it treats everyone from its most ardent users to, sadly, people on third-party platforms like, I dunno, TUMBLR, that perhaps want nothing at all to do with the privacy black hole that is Mark Zuckerberg’s dickishness incarnate but wake up and log on to find THIS UTTER BULLSHIT.
I go on Tumblr to be on Tumblr, Tumblr.  Please leave the shitty Facebook tactics to Facebook.

It’s a new service on tumblr that lets you find blogs of people you already know, people on your Gmail contacts and your Facebook friends. What’s the problem? If you have a Facebook, you might find it useful, and if you don’t, just ignore it.
Unless your problem is that you object to the very existence of the word “Facebook”, in which case you may have a problem more serious than the ability of tumblr to help you.

Reblogged from inothernews

inothernews:

Besides the hype, besides the technical fuckups of NASDAQ, besides the overvaluation and offering too many shares during their IPO, I think the reason Facebook’s stock is failing as much as it is right now is that people have come to realize that Everybody’s Favorite Social Network is just too obnoxious, intrusive, and data-scrapingly assholish in the way it treats everyone from its most ardent users to, sadly, people on third-party platforms like, I dunno, TUMBLR, that perhaps want nothing at all to do with the privacy black hole that is Mark Zuckerberg’s dickishness incarnate but wake up and log on to find THIS UTTER BULLSHIT.

I go on Tumblr to be on Tumblr, Tumblr.  Please leave the shitty Facebook tactics to Facebook.

It’s a new service on tumblr that lets you find blogs of people you already know, people on your Gmail contacts and your Facebook friends. What’s the problem? If you have a Facebook, you might find it useful, and if you don’t, just ignore it.

Unless your problem is that you object to the very existence of the word “Facebook”, in which case you may have a problem more serious than the ability of tumblr to help you.

"I'm sure you'll 'correct' me if you tihnk I'm wrong, but I've always been told (and observed) that effective satire aims up (occasionally across?) the power structure, and doesn't involve being an arse. So perhaps it might be a good idea to rename your tumblr 'PostArsery'? inbeforeyouaccusemeofbeinghumourlessyoucouldn'tbemorewrong;)"

Asked by Anonymous

It doesn’t matter what I “think”; your definition of satire is limited to what you would like it to be. Which is fine, but don’t project those limitations on to me. Five seconds on Google led me to this definition, but any dictionary will tell you the same thing.

I guess I’m sticking with PostSatire for the moment.

In other news, I would never accuse you of having no sense of humor because I don’t know anything about you. You have chosen to remain anonymous, for which I thank you. However, I would say that if the target of satire doesn’t quite “get” it, then that’s a total success from my point of view.

"Excuse you, "butt hurt" is rape culture. Watch your words, please."

Asked by chubbycinnamonfox

I suppose I should be encouraged that “butthurt” is the only thing you took out of that entire post. If it helps, I don’t accept that rape culture exists, and before you get “offended” by that, please read my posts explaining why I came to that conclusion.

ladyatheist:

struggle-and-emerge:

I don’t agree with this.
“An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind…”
Racism, whether against blacks, hispanics, asians, or whites, is racism nonetheless.
How ‘bout we find a positive way of ending it rather than perpetuating it??

Cool, but you’re really wrong though. First of all, you really need to figure out what racism really is. Go ahead and read all of that first.

Opinion. Condescending. Which is fair enough, but you seem to think it’s something else. Here’s a newsflash: black people do not get to redefine words. They don’t get to redefine words that already have perfectly acceptable meanings, and they certainly don’t get to act butthurt when other people refuse to accept these new meanings. This is what racism means. Go ahead and read all of that first.

You done reading? Good. Now let’s move on. There is no “positive way” to end racism. That’s some hippie little pipe dream that can never come true.

Opinion. Condescending. Anyone who thinks positive measures can eliminate racism is now put into a box with “hippie little pipe dream” written on it. You know, if you’re going to twist a narrative to suit yourself, you could at least try to be less obvious about it.

Racism is not a “positive” thing. It’s not comfortable and it doesn’t care about anyone’s feelings.

Well now that works both ways doesn’t it? Demonstration: do you care about my feelings? Or do you only care about people whose experience validates your own opinions? Think carefully about what your answer means for those people who are fighting racism.

No one asks nicely if they can oppress and dehumanize PoC. Due to that, conversations about race cannot be had in a “nice” way. The conversation has to be uncomfortable if you really want to get to the root of the problem and fix it.

Of course it’s going to make a lot of people uncomfortable. That’s fine. Making people uncomfortable is kind of where I live. Confronting people with the bullshit ideas they have is fine, too. But that’s not what the poster was talking about. The poster was talking about engaging in petty, personal, racist abuse. If you are claiming that black people are somehow unable to rein that in, that somehow they’re so angry that no only are they unable to form coherent thoughts, but that they should be entertained in those incoherent thoughts, then I think you are underestimating African-Americans as a whole.
I refuse to think less of black people than I think of anyone else.

If you try to coddle white people’s feelings during the conversation, all you’re doing is making them think that there is no real problem and therefore no one should be complaining. That is part of the reason why we have a generation full of white people who truly believe that racism ended with the Civil Rights Movement.

Refraining from racist abuse in a conversation which is designed to eliminate racism is not “coddling”. It’s common sense. That would be like if we as a society decided that murder was such a horrible crime that we had to kill anyone who did it. Well, OK, we do that, but that’s about the same level of logic (i.e. there is none).

No group has ever gotten their rights by simply asking nicely for them. The world doesn’t work that way.

While this is true, I can’t think of any group that ever got their rights by shouting angry racist abuse either. Can you? As ever, I’m open to correction here.

If you want your rights, if you want to be treated and respected like a full member of society, you have to fight for it. You have to take it from them. During that fight, hell yes some people are going to be “uncomfortable.” They’re supposed to be. They have to be if you expect any real, tangible change to occur.

There’s nothing wrong with fighting for your rights. Please keep in mind all the people who have managed to fight vigorously and energetically for their rights without ever hurling abuse at anyone. If you can’t think of anyone, please let me know and I can link you to some pages.

So by calling white people “crackers,” no one is “perpetuating” a damn thing. All they’re doing is making white people experience a fraction of the discomfort they experience on a daily basis. That’s the only way you can really get them to even begin to understand.

No, they’re not. They’re not making white people feel anything. There is no way for white people to relate to the black experience, being on the business end of racism in America. Pretending that hurling personal racist abuse at white people is some sort of conscious social experiment is ridiculous. And you should feel ashamed for making such a shoddy argument. Black people hurl personal abuse at people for the same reason white people do: they don’t know how to formulate their thoughts in an orderly fashion, or they just have pure blind rage that they can’t control or express properly.
Black people aren’t a different species. They have the same thoughts and feelings and failings as everyone else. What they don’t have is equality of opportunity, due to post-civil war institutional legacies. There are ways to combat that, but indulging inarticulate anger will never be one of them.

Reblogged from ladyatheist

ladyatheist:

struggle-and-emerge:

I don’t agree with this.

“An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind…”

Racism, whether against blacks, hispanics, asians, or whites, is racism nonetheless.

How ‘bout we find a positive way of ending it rather than perpetuating it??

Cool, but you’re really wrong though. First of all, you really need to figure out what racism really is. Go ahead and read all of that first.

Opinion. Condescending. Which is fair enough, but you seem to think it’s something else. Here’s a newsflash: black people do not get to redefine words. They don’t get to redefine words that already have perfectly acceptable meanings, and they certainly don’t get to act butthurt when other people refuse to accept these new meanings. This is what racism means. Go ahead and read all of that first.

You done reading? Good. Now let’s move on. There is no “positive way” to end racism. That’s some hippie little pipe dream that can never come true.

Opinion. Condescending. Anyone who thinks positive measures can eliminate racism is now put into a box with “hippie little pipe dream” written on it. You know, if you’re going to twist a narrative to suit yourself, you could at least try to be less obvious about it.

Racism is not a “positive” thing. It’s not comfortable and it doesn’t care about anyone’s feelings.

Well now that works both ways doesn’t it? Demonstration: do you care about my feelings? Or do you only care about people whose experience validates your own opinions? Think carefully about what your answer means for those people who are fighting racism.

No one asks nicely if they can oppress and dehumanize PoC. Due to that, conversations about race cannot be had in a “nice” way. The conversation has to be uncomfortable if you really want to get to the root of the problem and fix it.

Of course it’s going to make a lot of people uncomfortable. That’s fine. Making people uncomfortable is kind of where I live. Confronting people with the bullshit ideas they have is fine, too. But that’s not what the poster was talking about. The poster was talking about engaging in petty, personal, racist abuse. If you are claiming that black people are somehow unable to rein that in, that somehow they’re so angry that no only are they unable to form coherent thoughts, but that they should be entertained in those incoherent thoughts, then I think you are underestimating African-Americans as a whole.

I refuse to think less of black people than I think of anyone else.

If you try to coddle white people’s feelings during the conversation, all you’re doing is making them think that there is no real problem and therefore no one should be complaining. That is part of the reason why we have a generation full of white people who truly believe that racism ended with the Civil Rights Movement.

Refraining from racist abuse in a conversation which is designed to eliminate racism is not “coddling”. It’s common sense. That would be like if we as a society decided that murder was such a horrible crime that we had to kill anyone who did it. Well, OK, we do that, but that’s about the same level of logic (i.e. there is none).

No group has ever gotten their rights by simply asking nicely for them. The world doesn’t work that way.

While this is true, I can’t think of any group that ever got their rights by shouting angry racist abuse either. Can you? As ever, I’m open to correction here.

If you want your rights, if you want to be treated and respected like a full member of society, you have to fight for it. You have to take it from them. During that fight, hell yes some people are going to be “uncomfortable.” They’re supposed to be. They have to be if you expect any real, tangible change to occur.

There’s nothing wrong with fighting for your rights. Please keep in mind all the people who have managed to fight vigorously and energetically for their rights without ever hurling abuse at anyone. If you can’t think of anyone, please let me know and I can link you to some pages.

So by calling white people “crackers,” no one is “perpetuating” a damn thing. All they’re doing is making white people experience a fraction of the discomfort they experience on a daily basis. That’s the only way you can really get them to even begin to understand.

No, they’re not. They’re not making white people feel anything. There is no way for white people to relate to the black experience, being on the business end of racism in America. Pretending that hurling personal racist abuse at white people is some sort of conscious social experiment is ridiculous. And you should feel ashamed for making such a shoddy argument. Black people hurl personal abuse at people for the same reason white people do: they don’t know how to formulate their thoughts in an orderly fashion, or they just have pure blind rage that they can’t control or express properly.

Black people aren’t a different species. They have the same thoughts and feelings and failings as everyone else. What they don’t have is equality of opportunity, due to post-civil war institutional legacies. There are ways to combat that, but indulging inarticulate anger will never be one of them.

(Source: dionthesocialist)

"If you were to bother to read my books, to behave as educated persons would, you would learn that they are not sexy, and do not argue in favor of wildness of any kind. They beg that people be kinder and more responsible than they often are. It is true that some of the characters speak coarsely. That is because people speak coarsely in real life. Especially soldiers and hardworking men speak coarsely, and even our most sheltered children know that. And we all know, too, that those words really don’t damage children much. They didn’t damage us when we were young. It was evil deeds and lying that hurt us."

Reblogged from theamericanbear

Kurt Vonnegut

(Source: lukehackney)

extreme-irrelevancy:

hiddlesbodiddly:


Psychologists Discover How People Subconsciously Become Their Favorite Fictional Characters
Psychologists have discovered that while reading a book or story, people are prone to subconsciously adopt their behavior, thoughts, beliefs and internal responses to that of fictional characters as if they were their own.
Experts have dubbed this subconscious phenomenon ‘experience-taking,’ where people actually change their own behaviors and thoughts to match those of a fictional character that they can identify with.
Continue Reading


I need to point out that it’s this phenomenon taken to an extreme level of denial that lead to fictionkin and the like. Most everyone does this, the problem is when you don’t have the sense to figure out the cause and effect. You didn’t just “discover” you ARE this fiction character, reading the character made you mold your actions to  be like them. At least to an extent.

After reading Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, I was walking at a 35-degree angle for two weeks. This is a true story and not a joke.

Reblogged from extreme-irrelevancy

extreme-irrelevancy:

hiddlesbodiddly:

Psychologists Discover How People Subconsciously Become Their Favorite Fictional Characters

Psychologists have discovered that while reading a book or story, people are prone to subconsciously adopt their behavior, thoughts, beliefs and internal responses to that of fictional characters as if they were their own.

Experts have dubbed this subconscious phenomenon ‘experience-taking,’ where people actually change their own behaviors and thoughts to match those of a fictional character that they can identify with.

Continue Reading

I need to point out that it’s this phenomenon taken to an extreme level of denial that lead to fictionkin and the like. Most everyone does this, the problem is when you don’t have the sense to figure out the cause and effect. You didn’t just “discover” you ARE this fiction character, reading the character made you mold your actions to  be like them. At least to an extent.

After reading Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, I was walking at a 35-degree angle for two weeks. This is a true story and not a joke.

Over-Analyzing Race

Reblogged from dumbthingswhitepplsay

dumbthingswhitepplsay:

8 year old girl of color gets a humiliating award from her teacher.

This is how children of color are treated in schools, people, especially brown children. How will this child trust teachers actually care about her again? Huh? Tell me that.

And fuck the asshole commenters asking why a woman of color can’t check her child’s backpack and do all the homework with her. Just because you fucking white middle-classers have had that privilege, broke people working just to keep a roof over their head and food on their table aren’t as fucking lucky and free as you.

While this was certainly not a good approach for a teacher to take, and I don’t see how you could take this as “a joke”, I can’t find any evidence of racial implications. If you can find any, please link me. (Please note that “it’s obvious it’s racial” or “typical white person” etc. do not count as evidence of anything other than any personal bias you have chosen to impose on this.)

Yes, the teacher was white, and yes the little girl was Hispanic, but where I come from (urban SoCal), that would describe pretty much every single student-teacher interaction. So unless you’re also hailing every gold star a Hispanic kids gets from a white teacher as a victory for race relations…