five seconds on google

"

Oh—you wouldn’t date a girl who’s ever been a stripper?
In that case, I wouldn’t date a guy who’s ever been to a strip club.

Oh—you wouldn’t date a girl who’s ever done porn?
In that case, I wouldn’t date a guy who’s ever watched porn.

You’re the reason we exist.
You’re the demand to our supply.
If you disdain sex workers, don’t you dare consume our labor.

As they say in the industry, “People jack off with the left hand and point with the right.”

"

Reblogged from digital-sins

Lux ATL

If you want to say that people shouldn’t be judgemental about sex industry workers, then just say that. I’d be all for that, although I’d start with saying we shouldn’t be judgemental about anyone, and work my way up.

Your logic is unclear and comes across as petty. It makes it sound like you’re judging people for being judgemental, which defeats itself as an argument.

In any case, we need to get into a mode of thinking where people feel they can want to date anyone they feel like, for any reasons they want.

If you have a thing where you don’t feel like girls who have been strippers, then don’t date them. If you don’t want to date guys who’ve been to strip clubs, then don’t date them. But don’t not-date guys who’ve been to strip clubs because you are aware of some guys who don’t want to date strippers. It’s nonsensical.

And what sort of sinister fuck-up jacks off with his left hand?

(Source: stripperina)

fromrusholmewithlove:

ladbelfast:

BusesIRA

Just wait until someone tells them where the name “Belfast” comes from…

This is how many unionists actually think. I feel sort of sad for them, because at some point you have to feel sad for people who don’t understand when they’ve lost.

Reblogged from irishthings

fromrusholmewithlove:

ladbelfast:

BusesIRA

Just wait until someone tells them where the name “Belfast” comes from…

This is how many unionists actually think. I feel sort of sad for them, because at some point you have to feel sad for people who don’t understand when they’ve lost.

What’s Taking So Long?

Reblogged from astupidbitch

astupidbitch:

When I say I’m ready to go, I’m ready to go.

It’s not your cue to just then start fucking around with your stupid fucking girl shit. All the stupid girl shit should be done when you say you’re ready to go.

I’m not standing around in the hall wearing my coat for twenty minutes when I could be watching cartoons.

Get your shit together.

Man Kills 3 at Jewish Centers in Kansas City Suburb

Reblogged from helvetebrann

wholegrainlofat:

cunt—goddess:

Umm are you kidding me? The shooter is a former KKK member and with a history of anti-Semitism. He deliberately targeted a Jewish Community Center. What about this isn’t a hate crime?

Agreed.

For the love of Pete! There is news footage of him yelling “Heil Hitler”!

How can this not a be a hate crime? Can you think of some way this could be more hatey or more crimey? Absolutely awful.

More on this from Ha’aretz

A Sense Of Perspective

Reblogged from listener-blue

listener-blue:

doctor-no-boyfriend:

"those aren’t REAL feminists."—-

Is practically the same thing as the disgruntled

—-“not all men are like that.”

Yes.

Except men don’t choose to be men. They simply are men. So lumping all men together is completely unfair. We shouldn’t assume all men have the bad traits of a few men, much like we shouldn’t assume all women have the bad traits of a few women. Because they can’t stop being men/women. They can’t disassociate themselves from that group.

Feminists choose to be feminists. They take on that label of their own free will. They can drop it at any time. So while we shouldn’t assume all feminists are like that (because they’re not) it is perfectly reasonable to say that all feminists must take on the burden of (and hopefully educate) the shit side of their movement. By choosing that label they choose to associate with the shitty feminists. All choices come with consequences and, sadly for the good feminists, being lumped in with radfems/TERFs is the consequence of calling yourself a feminist.

Feminists choose to be feminists.

snotvanilla:

odins-one-eyed-fuck:

lovelyphantasmagoria:

setbabiesonfire:

swallowedwholeinnegatives:

What does this mean?

That, my friend, is exactly the question you have to ask.

YOU LEFT OUT THE MOTHERFUCKING CRYSTAL PYRAMIDS THEY FOUND ON THE FLOOR OF THE BERMUDA TRIANGLE

OLDER THAN THE AZTECS AND COMPLETELY SMOOTH AND 3 TIMES BIGGER THAN THE EGYPTIAN CHEOPS AND NO ONE KNOWS HOW IT GOT THERE.

IM SORRY BUT WHY IS THIS THE FIRST TIME IVE HEARD OF THE CRYSTAL PYRAMIDS WHAT IS THIS SHIT

OKAY HERE’S YOUR DEBRIEFING OF THE CRYSTAL PYRAMID BECAUSE THAT IS SOME CRAZY SHIT.
IN 2012 FRENCH AND AMERICAN SCIENTISTS STUDYING THE BERMUDA TRIANGLE STUMBLED UPON THIS HUGE TRANSLUCENT PYRAMID
THIS THING MEASURED 300 METERS WIDE AND 200 METERS TALL. THAT’S BIGGER THAN THE PYRAMIDS OF GIZA SO YOU COULD IMAGINE HOW CRAZY THIS WAS TO THE SCIENTISTS
NOW THIS IS ALL 2000 METERS UNDERWATER. THE SCIENTISTS THEN DISCOVERED TWO HOLES AT THE TOP OF THE PYRAMID THAT MOVE WATER THRU AT AN EXTREMELY FAST RATE. THIS CAUSES MASIVE SURGE WAVES AND MIST ON THE SURFACE. THAT MAY BE THE REASON FOR THE INCIDENTS WITH BOATS AND PLANES CRASHING THERE
THEY’RE SAYING THAT THIS PYRAMID COULD BE FROM THE TIME BEFORE THE BIBLE SAYS NOAH’S ARK HAPPENED
OR ALIENS
BUT WHATEVER IT IS THE BERMUDA TRIANGLE JUST GOT LIKE A BILLION TIMES CREEPIER

The crystal triangle you’re referring to is a confirmed hoax. Five seconds on Google.
As for the rest, maybe we shouldn’t be too amazed that lots of cultures happened upon the same design when that design is, essentially, a stylised pile of rocks. I would expect all the basic geometric shapes to be “discovered” by lots of people. Why not? I’m sure there’s lots of circles/spirals and rock piles and stick-shaped things in most cultures. It doesn’t mean anything.

Reblogged from philsdaydreams

snotvanilla:

odins-one-eyed-fuck:

lovelyphantasmagoria:

setbabiesonfire:

swallowedwholeinnegatives:

What does this mean?

That, my friend, is exactly the question you have to ask.

YOU LEFT OUT THE MOTHERFUCKING CRYSTAL PYRAMIDS THEY FOUND ON THE FLOOR OF THE BERMUDA TRIANGLE

OLDER THAN THE AZTECS AND COMPLETELY SMOOTH AND 3 TIMES BIGGER THAN THE EGYPTIAN CHEOPS AND NO ONE KNOWS HOW IT GOT THERE.

IM SORRY BUT WHY IS THIS THE FIRST TIME IVE HEARD OF THE CRYSTAL PYRAMIDS WHAT IS THIS SHIT

OKAY HERE’S YOUR DEBRIEFING OF THE CRYSTAL PYRAMID BECAUSE THAT IS SOME CRAZY SHIT.

IN 2012 FRENCH AND AMERICAN SCIENTISTS STUDYING THE BERMUDA TRIANGLE STUMBLED UPON THIS HUGE TRANSLUCENT PYRAMID

THIS THING MEASURED 300 METERS WIDE AND 200 METERS TALL. THAT’S BIGGER THAN THE PYRAMIDS OF GIZA SO YOU COULD IMAGINE HOW CRAZY THIS WAS TO THE SCIENTISTS

NOW THIS IS ALL 2000 METERS UNDERWATER. THE SCIENTISTS THEN DISCOVERED TWO HOLES AT THE TOP OF THE PYRAMID THAT MOVE WATER THRU AT AN EXTREMELY FAST RATE. THIS CAUSES MASIVE SURGE WAVES AND MIST ON THE SURFACE. THAT MAY BE THE REASON FOR THE INCIDENTS WITH BOATS AND PLANES CRASHING THERE

THEY’RE SAYING THAT THIS PYRAMID COULD BE FROM THE TIME BEFORE THE BIBLE SAYS NOAH’S ARK HAPPENED

OR ALIENS

BUT WHATEVER IT IS THE BERMUDA TRIANGLE JUST GOT LIKE A BILLION TIMES CREEPIER

The crystal triangle you’re referring to is a confirmed hoax. Five seconds on Google.

As for the rest, maybe we shouldn’t be too amazed that lots of cultures happened upon the same design when that design is, essentially, a stylised pile of rocks. I would expect all the basic geometric shapes to be “discovered” by lots of people. Why not?

I’m sure there’s lots of circles/spirals and rock piles and stick-shaped things in most cultures. It doesn’t mean anything.

(Source: zowieee)

"I don't get Holocaust deniers. I mean, I've visited Dachau, and I've been inside the buildings. I /felt/ the horror there. How can anyone say it never happened?"

Asked by Anonymous

It doesn’t fit into their ideology. Some people think Hitler did a good job, which he sort of did if you value a nation’s economy and military success over things like education and health and human dignity. Which is kind of a definition of right-wing politics.

socialjusticemalarkey:

Because they’re deluded.  I really don’t know how else to describe it.

Billions of dollars to blow up nameless foreigners for reasons we don’t fully understand? Sure thing, buddy!

Millions of dollars to help children eat at school to stop them from starving? Not so much.

Right wing politics, right? And Hitler was the epitome of right-wing politics. Zero crime. Zero unemployment. Roaring economy. Corporations unimpeded (and actively encouraged) in their barbarian quests for profits. Unions smashed. Any sort of left-wing organisation annihilated. Intellectualism smashed. All the good stuff the right-wing people need to thrive.

The problem is that Hitler massacred six million-ish Jews for no reason at all. Even the most rabid right-winger can spot the problem there. How the hell are they going to dig themselves out of this hole?

As is traditional with ideologies, the coping mechanism branches off in two mutually exclusive directions.

The first technique is to deny the holocaust. It never happened. The whole thing was a marketing exercise to ensure sympathy for the formation of a Jewish state, or some other bunk. All the records were faked, all the witnesses are lying, and even if it did happen, the numbers are exaggerated.

I’ve seen Holocaust deniers, totally without irony, claim that I should shut up about the Holocaust because “only” 1.5 million people died and not 6 million. This is the sort of mind you’re dealing with.

The second technique is to “explain” at length why Jews are destroying the world, why they only look after themselves, how they run the banks and the movies, how they’re also somehow in charge of the labour movements, and the whole world economy is just a front for the Jews to get what they want from everyone else - our gold.

The strong undercurrent to this sort of thinking is that no one could really have blamed Hitler for killing so many Jews.

The sharper minds among you will understand fairly quickly why these two positions are mutually exclusive.

I’m pretty sure they’re not homophones.

(This is satire, I’m on your side.)

I’m pretty sure they’re not homophones.

(This is satire, I’m on your side.)

(Source: cargocollective.com)

The World's Most Dangerous Amusement Park

In the years since it closed down in 1996, Action Park has earned a reputation as the most insane — and possibly the most dangerous — amusement park that ever existed. A lawless land that was ruled by drunk teenage employees, frequented by even drunker teenage guests, and filled with rides that seemed to defy even the most basic notions of physics and common sense.

Reblogged from facebooksexism

facebooksexism:

feminismisprettycool:

When dudes are like, “Oh, I believe in equal pay because I have a daughter,” like they could not imagine that women were worth equal pay before they had one they cared about. Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

Ah, the narcissistic father type. 

Well, it’s a natural human reaction to try to relate to new information in any way you can. A man cannot relate to being a woman (and look out for the tidal wave of abuse from people like you if they try!), so they take the next best thing - relating women-stuff to women that they know and care about.

It’s called compassion, and it works both ways.